The Armies of the Night

The Armies of the Night

These are the Armies of the Night. They are 100,000 strong. They outnumber the cops five to one. They could run New York City.

The outrage and fear upon the film’s release described in this week’s reading on The Warrior‘s really helped me to understand the need for theaters that were willing to screen what others deemed controversial. Walter Hill’s 1979 cult classic, The Warriors, was initially met with negative reactions and branded an “inciteful film.” When you stop to think about the fact that today it has attained a massive cult following, you realize that that wouldn’t have been possible if not for theaters, like the Rialto, that were home to a sort of hodgepodge of people all searching for exactly what the mainstream cinemas tried to conceal.

I found this week’s reading about the Rialto interesting, particularly the descriptions of the types of people in attendance. The negative connotations that come to mind when we think of exploitation films make it easy to assume that that the audiences would somehow reflect the gritty themes that are typically explored in this genre. This week’s reading, “Horror at the Crossroads: Class, Gender, and Taste at the Rialto” reminds us that the people who sought out these movies were perfectly average. In fact, it paints 42nd street as a sort of safe-haven not just for an emerging gay subculture, but for anyone who was looking to explore life beyond societal norms.

"While some accounts present the Rialto as a “lurid place” and its audience as largely
working class, it clearly attracted many members of the middle classes, although the cinema was not simply composed of Harvard-educated entrepreneurs or avant-garde critics either. Indeed, the character of the cinema and its audience owed much to its location in Times Square, which during the 1930s and 1940s was the cultural equivalent of a “primordial soup,” an environment in which radically different social groups converged and collided, and out of which a variety of cultural forms and practices would emerge—the postwar gay subculture, the Beats, the cult movie audience, and the postwar art-cinema scene—cultural forms and practices that were often intimately connected with one another."

I found this video interesting because it has actual footage with commentary on the theaters of 42nd street. I feel that this video really reaffirms the idea that these theaters served more of a purpose than to exploit censored topics – it was a hub for social activity. The hook was the idea of “adult theaters” but people went there for the experience just as much as they went for the subject matter.

This second video is in here because I really enjoyed seeing the contrast between 42nd street then, and 42nd street now.


As for The Warriors itself, it was by far my favorite screening this semester. I went into class unsure of how I’d feel at the end of the night, but the film surpassed any and all expectations I had. The plot wasn’t quite like anything I’d seen before, and I found myself drawn into the story of this ragtag group from the very beginning. As tensions grew in the movie, I found myself actually engaging and trying to figure out what would happen next. The film was full of action, suspense, humor, and badassery – and one of the best parts about it is the fact that you don’t have to be a cult enthusiast in order to appreciate it. I would definitely recommend the film to anyone who hasn’t seen it (and I already have).

2 thoughts on “The Armies of the Night

  1. reillyliberto's avatarreillyliberto

    I also enjoyed this weeks reading on the Rialto, I like the videos you included of 42nd street. I hadn’t thought about why 42nd street was so influential, it’s nice to know that people had a place to really explore their interests and identities. I agree with your point that you don’t have to be a cult enthusiast to enjoy the Warriors, I think anyone could find something to like about it.

    Like

    Reply
  2. kelsiekoerber's avatarkelsiekoerber

    I loved this film as well, it’s one I’ve been meaning to watch for a while and was for sure impressed. As for the comment you made
    About it being “Inciteful” I wonder if the warriors
    Was released today
    If it would be met with the same amount of controversy or even more. I definitely think people would find something wrong with it, something to complain about or call it bad, but at the same time I think the ending is redeemable in the sense that the good guys win and it sort of corrects itself. The scenes when the boys interact with women wouldn’t slide today though I can tell you that.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a reply to reillyliberto Cancel reply