Carnival of Cult

This week’s readings where all about understanding cult and what better way then using horror as an example. Some of horrors most recognizable and beloved films are recognized as bad films.These films might not be blockbuster hits but are seen as fan favorites because of the films off beat feeling or its originality or purely because its bad. The horror genre has its own dedicated cult following allowing for these spin offs and funky b movies to be made. Horror also tends to follow a certain pattern or formula, while these films don’t have a particular message they tend to stay conservative rather then attempt to break the mold of the classic horror structure.

Cult films and horror movies feel all too familiar together and there couldn’t have been a better film than Carnaval of Souls (1962). This film has all the makings of a classic horror but it breaks the mold and does it stunningly. The film follows Mary Henry (Candace Hilligoss) to a new home as a church organist after being the only seen survivor of a fatal car crash. On the way there she sees a far away structure that we later find out is an abandoned carnival. Mary also gets spooked by a scary looking man outside the window of the car but couldn’t find him after spinning out of control. Once settled in Mary meets her next door neighbor John Linden (Sydney Berger) a not so drunk drunk that attempts to win Mary over.

Personally, I thought the movie was visually very exciting. It was aesthetically appealing and beautifully shot, however, it was a bit slow for my taste. I completely understand the fact that the slow pace of the movie was to add to the creepy atmosphere, but it was a bit too slow for me. All of the scenes shot in the abandon pavilion were great, they were dreamlike and creepy, a very odd feeling to it all. The ending seemed quiet rushed, and I was not a huge fan, but I do understand that the whole beauty of the film was the journey we had to take for an obvious ending. The slow pace of the film, as well as the random appearances of “the man” create a very relatable feeling of paranoia and make for a beautiful psychological horror. Especially when Mary speaks about life being so much easier and so much more beautiful when it is daytime, and the feeling of isolation that comes with nighttime.

I guess this relates to my personal taste, another topic that we tackled this week. This week, I learned that taste is founded on the combination of cultural upbringing and education. I grew up watching fast-paced movies like the Fast and Furious franchise in my childhood. This might explain why slow-paced movies (no matter how gorgeous and entertaining I think it is) are hard for me to follow and stay interested in. Similar to the idea of form and function, where a movie might be made to satisfy popular demand and interests, and another might be made for a different reason than to satisfy popular demand.

5 thoughts on “Carnival of Cult

  1. averizuech's avataraverizuech

    I enjoy how you said it was a bit too slow for your taste. Dr. Schlegel even said that it may be before he started the movie. I agree with you that at some points it was too slow and then the ending was rushed. It seemed like the director wanted us to be caught in the movie and then was like ok we need to wrap this up. I also grew up watching movies that were a little more fast paced and I agree that this may have to do with our taste and liking. I personally like how my taste can fluctuate though and I can be open minded to different movies that I may not want to choose as a first option.

    Like

    Reply
  2. jaylincard's avatarjaylincard

    I like how you incorporated our discussion about taste into your blog post. Having grown up watching fast-paced movies, it makes sense that something like this wouldn’t appeal to you. I really enjoyed the movie, but then again I’ve been exposed to a lot of slow-paced movies. I feel like this just highlights the points made in the essay on taste, and proves that there really are a lot of different factors that go into it.

    Like

    Reply
  3. spencerwickert's avatarspencerwickert

    I found it ironic that the soul who is going to be working at a church was the one selected to come back. I also was wondering why she was the only one to return and none of the others? The pace of the movie was just right, I never had a moment when I though it was slow. It was just enough to keep you wondering on what will happen next. Its interesting to reflect on your childhood movies and see how they have shaped your opinion.

    Like

    Reply
  4. jeremywilkinson97's avatarjeremywilkinson97

    I partially agree with your statement about how a person’s taste is dependent upon cultural upbringing and education. This idea partially works for me because when I was a kid, my favorite movie was Spider-Man and I still love Marvel movies and almost any kind of action movie, except for Fan4stic. I disagree because as I have gotten older, I have appreciated more movies and in fact, I think my current favorite movie is a movie I just saw this weekend, Parasite. So, in the end, your statement partially works for me.

    Like

    Reply
  5. pathannon74's avatarpathannon74

    I really enjoyed reading your blog this week! The main paragraph that I would like to talk about, is your writing on taste. I do believe that everyone’s taste develops as a result of what they grew up watching, or doing. Many things that you grow up not liking, you eventually like, and vice-versa. However, the things you grow up loving, you never stop loving!.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a reply to jeremywilkinson97 Cancel reply